Self-storage
Not allowed
- Code section
- MCZO 601 use table (p. 6-8)
- The code's own words for this use
- Self-storage facilities
- Transcription confidence
- high
Not listed for this district in the Chapter 6 use table
Base district · commercial · unincorporated Maricopa County AZ
Neighborhood commercial - daily-needs shops and services
Every verdict below is the base-district answer read out of the ordinance of record, with the section that says so. A use with no row is shown as unknown rather than folded into “no”.
Not allowed
Not listed for this district in the Chapter 6 use table
Allowed, but only with a discretionary approval
The commercial standards table (504) contains no minimum-lot-area-per-dwelling-unit row, so density is governed by coverage/height/parking rather than a stated cap. Confirm with the county before underwriting a unit count
Allowed, but only with a discretionary approval
DERIVED by stacking two separately-listed POD uses (Multifamily >2 units + retail/service uses) on one site. Not an express MCZO entitlement
Unknown — this dataset has no row for it
No row for RV or boat storage in C-1 in this dataset. That means unknown — go and look. It does not mean no.
A blank cell means this dataset carries no number for that standard — read it as “go and look”, not as zero.
| Standard | Value | Field |
|---|---|---|
| Floor area ratio (FAR) | — | far |
| Maximum height | 40 ft | max_height_ft |
| Maximum site coverage | 60% | site_coverage |
| Minimum lot area | 6,000 sf | min_lot_area_sf |
| Minimum lot width | 60 ft | min_lot_width_ft |
| Minimum lot area per dwelling unit | — | min_lot_area_per_du_sf |
| Maximum density | — | max_du_per_acre_derived |
| Front setback | 10 ft | setback_front_ft |
| Street-side setback | 15 ft | setback_side_street_ft |
| Interior side setback | 0 ft | setback_side_interior_ft |
| Rear setback | 0 ft | setback_rear_ft |
Dimensional standards from MCZO 503.1.3 / 504 / 601.
Standards notes. Interior side and rear: none required except 10 ft (side) and 25 ft (rear) where adjacent to a Rural or Residential zoning district
No district in this dataset publishes a floor area ratio: intensity in this code is governed by lot coverage, height and — for residential — density or minimum lot area per dwelling unit. See the metro page for the provenance note on that.
Run the envelope this district allows, free, in about a minute — lot area, FAR or height, and the residual land value it supports.
The quick screen is free and needs no account. The sample study is the seven-page deliverable the Feasibility Desk produces.
base district only; overlays not checked — Luke AFB overlay can flip answers
This is a base-district reading of the ordinance text, transcribed from the source below. It is not a Zoning Verification Letter, not a determination by the jurisdiction, not legal advice, and not a substitute for asking the planning department about a specific parcel. Overlays, recorded plan conditions, rezoning stipulations and parcel geometry are not checked here, and any one of them can change the answer on this page.
Verify locally before you spend money. Call the planning counter, pull the parcel's zoning-map designation and its case history, and confirm the section cited above still reads the way it reads here.
Full provenance, the source hashes and the known limitations for unincorporated Maricopa County AZ →