Self-storage
Not allowed
- Ordinance symbol
- —
- Code section
- MZO 11-8-2 (Table 11-8-2)
- The code's own words for this use
- Mini-Storage
- Transcription confidence
- high
Expressly shown as a prohibited use (em dash)
Base district · commercial · City of Mesa AZ
Downtown Core. Tallest downtown district; Mini-Storage prohibited
Every verdict below is the base-district answer read out of the ordinance of record, with the section that says so. A use with no row is shown as unknown rather than folded into “no”.
Not allowed
Expressly shown as a prohibited use (em dash)
Permitted by right
Note 1: 'Multiple Residence permitted at a minimum density of 20 units/acre in an exclusive multiple residence project. No minimum density when part of a mixed-use project.' Same note-16 anomaly
Not allowed
Expressly prohibited (em dash)
Not allowed
Expressly prohibited (em dash)
Permitted by right
Retail, eating and drinking, offices, personal services and residential are all listed in the same column. Note 15 to Table 11-8-2 makes several commercial rows 'Only permitted in conjunction with non-residential uses'
Not allowed
Not listed in the district use table; the table preamble states 'Use classifications not listed are prohibited'
A blank cell means this dataset carries no number for that standard — read it as “go and look”, not as zero.
| Standard | Value | Field |
|---|---|---|
| Floor area ratio (FAR) | — | far |
| Maximum height | 60 ft | max_height_ft |
| Maximum site coverage | — | site_coverage |
| Minimum lot area | — | min_lot_area_sf |
| Minimum lot width | — | min_lot_width_ft |
| Minimum lot area per dwelling unit | — | min_lot_area_per_du_sf |
| Maximum density | 40 du / acre | max_du_per_acre_derived |
| Front setback | 10 ft | setback_front_ft |
| Street-side setback | 10 ft | setback_side_street_ft |
| Interior side setback | 0 ft | setback_side_interior_ft |
| Rear setback | 0 ft | setback_rear_ft |
Dimensional standards from MZO 11-8-2 / 11-8-5 (Table 11-8-5).
Standards notes. Height 60 ft applies to non-residential development. No minimum lot area or lot coverage standard is stated. Non-residential interior side and rear 0 ft, or 10 ft adjacent to residential development. Residential interior side 5 ft, rear 10 ft. Multiple Residence in DC carries a MINIMUM density of 20 units/acre in an exclusive multiple-residence project and no minimum when part of a mixed-use project (note 1 to Table 11-8-2). Minimum open space 200 sf per dwelling unit
No district in this dataset publishes a floor area ratio: intensity in this code is governed by lot coverage, height and — for residential — density or minimum lot area per dwelling unit. See the metro page for the provenance note on that.
Run the envelope this district allows, free, in about a minute — lot area, FAR or height, and the residual land value it supports.
The quick screen is free and needs no account. The sample study is the seven-page deliverable the Feasibility Desk produces.
base district only; overlay geometry not checked — an Airfield or Form-Based Code designation can flip answers
This is a base-district reading of the ordinance text, transcribed from the source below. It is not a Zoning Verification Letter, not a determination by the jurisdiction, not legal advice, and not a substitute for asking the planning department about a specific parcel. Overlays, recorded plan conditions, rezoning stipulations and parcel geometry are not checked here, and any one of them can change the answer on this page.
Verify locally before you spend money. Call the planning counter, pull the parcel's zoning-map designation and its case history, and confirm the section cited above still reads the way it reads here.
Full provenance, the source hashes and the known limitations for City of Mesa AZ →